Page 24 of 29

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 3:05 am
by HertzDevil
recme wrote:i have some suggestions. can the insert button (ins) on famitracker be customized? pressing fn + prt sc can get oh so annoying at times.

Anything can be added to the accelerator table as jsr wants.

recme wrote:also, can buffer length be a little more precise? it always has to be either on 52, 57, 62, etc.. is there any reason why its like this?

Click the slider once and use the arrow keys.

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 6:37 pm
by graypesoda
Just wanted to report a problem where the interface appears very small on my laptop... only happens in this beta version

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:18 am
by recme
Stratelier wrote:
recme wrote:i have some suggestions. can the insert button (ins) on famitracker be customized? pressing fn + prt sc can get oh so annoying at times.

You have one of those laptops too?


yeah, its pretty annoying. i recently got this laptop, and this whole issue really breaks my workflow :c

also, thanks hertzdevil.

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:16 am
by NicolasMaeder
Why has jsr not posted anything in the FamiTracker forums since after October 2015? I think he suddenly died or just took an ongoing break from developing the tracker. If jsr does not respond to any comment in this forum's threads within several months then FamiTracker should go open source.

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:23 am
by HertzDevil
This duration of inactivity is totally normal at the old forum; it has been like that for 6~7 years. Recall that 0.4.3 stable was released almost a year after its beta build.

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:12 am
by Roflo
Famitracker already is open source :p

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 10:46 am
by NicolasMaeder
Roflo wrote:Famitracker already is open source :p

Oh yes, it is. Thanks! =)

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:20 pm
by NicolasMaeder
Increase the tempo limit from 255 to 2500, because the highest playback rate is now 1000 Hz.

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:14 pm
by HertzDevil
If the tempo limit was not 1000 when the refresh rate was limited to 400 Hz, there is no point to raise that to 2500 either. It is also possible to edit the tempo value in a hex editor directly.

Re: Version 0.5 preview

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:37 am
by Stratelier
Does 255 being on a byte threshold have any relevance? Fullspeed at tempo 255 would correlate to an engine speed of only 612 Hz.